Journals that ask for money: poll conclusions
February 5, 2013 3 Comments
This poll was posted in January 2013 in different academic forums, 250 answers were collected and approximately 75 comments. The question was: will you publish in an indexed journal that charges you fees? And the results are: 39,60% Yes, 60,40% No.
Regarding the question in itself, it was a closed one, with no option to answer ‘it depends on’, because it would have been the preferred one.
My summary on the issue and your comments are:
1. Journals have no access to funds; they have a lot of expenses to make the journal attractive to authors, and that is why they ask for a fee.
2. Journal editors feel uncomfortable and somehow ashamed about this issue.
3. If the fee is reasonable, not higher than around 300 dollars, it is worthwhile the investment for the author, but only if the journal is well indexed and open access.
4. Authors are able to pay this amount if they share the fees with co-authors and they get some help from their university.
But…
1. Some authors from developing countries find 300 dollars out of their reach, even with co-authorship and university refund, if any. And this upset scholars in general because is pretty unfair and incompatible with open opportunities, and that this system is closing the doors to some knowledge to be disseminated.
2. Moreover, academics feel uneasy with all this issue, they do not understand that some journals owners earn a profit and they do not pay for content or peer review. It is like they were taking advantage of the necessity of scholars to publish in indexed journals, and again, is unfair.
3. May be the ethics of some journals/publishers are questionable but I think that the model itself is beneficial for the industry. The challenge is about the knowledge (innovative, reliable, reputable, biased, ethical, etc.) not about who pays for it or its dissemination.
Charging fees to authors is an uncomfortable necessity for journals, which work because is based on the obligation for scholars to publish in journals. Well, it makes sense as a business but, was it not all about knowledge and its dissemination? Who can improve this system? Governments? Market itself? Technology?…
I THINK THAT MODERN RESEARCH INDIA IS SINKING UNDER THE WEIGHT OF ITS PRINTED KNOWLEDGE..ONLY NAAC-TEAM AND AICTE IS SPREADING CHRONICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH..NO METHODOLOGY,NO RE-GENERATION,NO RE-CONSEQUENCES,NO SETTLEMENT…NO PEDAGOGY,NO CURRICULUM,NO CONTENT….MORE RESEARCH SCHOLARS AND RESEARCHERS HAVE SUFFERED FROM SEVERAL INFRASTRUCTURAL BOTTLE-NECKS..TODAY’S EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HAS THUS BEEN COMMERCIALIZED AND LEARNING IS ON SALE..IN OUR SOCIAL RESEARCH LIKE A FREE RESEARCH INDIA,WHICH IS THE GREAVEST PROBLEM TO RESEARCHING THE RESEARCHERS…MORE INSTITUTIONS PRODUCE GRADUATES AND CERTIFICATES ONLY,THEY DON’T PRODUCE MINDS AND QUALITIES..
Sorry you see it that way, though i agree with you to some degree, the knowledge is being open and accesible to all, and the publishing industry has to adapt.
TO JOURNALS THAT ASK FOR MONRY—DUKANDARI [BUSINESS]…